This property has a documented history as a property with a heating oil tank predating 1986. Historical insurance policies issued during those prior operations and through 1986 could fund a cleanup — and recover costs already spent.
This property contained an abandoned 300-gallon underground heating oil tank, discovered during highway construction activities at what had been a previous residential living space; the tank was found in highly deteriorated condition, having leaked heating oil (diesel) to surrounding soil and groundwater over an extended period. Cleanup work included removal of the UST along with 200 gallons of emulsified fuel and rinsate, excavation of approximately 662 tons of petroleum-impacted soil, and off-site treatment of 10,200 gallons of petroleum-affected groundwater. Remaining work includes installation of groundwater monitoring wells for at least four quarters of sampling and addressing residual contamination associated with an on-site sewer line. That history could support an insurance cost recovery claim against carriers who issued insurance policies 40+ years ago.
Why Historical Insurance Policies May Be Accessible
Pre-1986 Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies were occurrence-based and did not contain an effective pollution exclusion in Washington. If contamination occurred while those policies were active, those historical insurance carriers may still have a legal obligation to fund the cleanup costs, even if the business closed or the property changed hands.
The extreme deterioration and long-term abandonment of this residential heating oil tank is consistent with an installation dating well before modern UST regulations took hold — and well before 1986, when occurrence-based Commercial General Liability policies began routinely incorporating effective pollution exclusions. Residential heating oil tanks of this era were in active service during precisely the years such policies were issued without those exclusions, meaning historical carriers may retain an obligation tied to the slow, ongoing release that caused this contamination. The documented remediation expenditures — UST removal, substantial soil excavation, groundwater extraction and treatment, and continuing monitoring — are the type of cleanup costs those pre-1986 policies were written to cover.
Restorical's role is to locate viable historical policies, determine whether a successful coverage claim is possible, and assist our clients and their legal counsel to obtain insurance coverage. Restorical then manages the claim, including accounting, to ensure the cleanup is funded in a timely manner.
What We Look For
- Historical insurance policies (pre-1986)
- Policy numbers, carrier names, and coverage periods
- Connection between contamination timing and policy period
- Evidence linking cleanup obligation to insured activity
What We Deliver
- Historical Coverage Chart
- Trigger Analysis & Property/Policy Nexus
- Coverage strategy with recommendations
- Insurance funding for your remediation
- Claims Management & Forensic Accounting
The Restorical Proven Process
Ready to learn more?
Contact UsThis analysis is preliminary and based on publicly available records. Restorical Research is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.


