Industrial & Manufacturing cleanup site — Restorical Research
US Navy Keyport OU2
610 Dowell St, Keyport, Kitsap County
Restorical Research
Preliminary Site-Specific Analysis

This property has a documented history as a industrial and manufacturing facility predating 1986. Historical insurance policies issued during those prior operations and through 1986 could fund a cleanup — and recover costs already spent.

This approximately one-acre area on the eastern portion of Naval Base Kitsap Keyport was the site of a former chrome plating shop (Building 72), where past releases included chrome plating solutions spilling onto the ground, plating wastes discharging to a utility trench, and plating solutions leaking through cracks in the shop floor. Cleanup under the Standard Cleanup program included demolition of Building 72 and removal of soil hotspots in 1998–1999, independent remedial actions for petroleum releases from leaky underground storage tanks, and long-term monitoring of groundwater, sediment, and tissue that began in the mid-1990s and has continued for many years. The site is now in performance monitoring status, with the former plating shop replaced by a parking lot and institutional controls in place. That history could support an insurance cost recovery claim against carriers who issued insurance policies 40+ years ago.

Former Use
Former Industrial & Manufacturing
Address610 Dowell St, Keyport, Kitsap County
Historical UseIndustrial & Manufacturing
Est. Operating SincePre-1986
StatusConstruction Complete — Performance Monitoring
Contamination & Investigation
Site Assessment Summary
ContaminantsChromium from plating operations and petroleum hydrocarbons from leaking underground storage tanks in soil, groundwater, and sediment
Media ImpactedSoil, Groundwater, Surface Water, Sediment
Regulatory ProgramMTCA — Standard Cleanup
Ecology Site #522

Why Historical Insurance Policies May Be Accessible

Pre-1986 Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies were occurrence-based and did not contain an effective pollution exclusion in Washington. If contamination occurred while those policies were active, those historical insurance carriers may still have a legal obligation to fund the cleanup costs, even if the business closed or the property changed hands.

Chrome plating operations at Building 72 generated the spills, trench discharges, and floor leaks that contaminated this site — releases that occurred decades before 1986, when occurrence-based CGL policies still covered pollution claims without an effective exclusion. The remediation costs documented here — hotspot excavation, building demolition, petroleum cleanup, and more than two decades of groundwater and sediment monitoring — are the type of long-duration expenditures those historical policies were designed to fund. Because the Navy's plating operations and underground storage tanks were the identified contamination sources, carriers who insured those operations during the active plating era may still bear obligation for both past and ongoing cleanup costs.

Restorical's role is to locate viable historical policies, determine whether a successful coverage claim is possible, and assist our clients and their legal counsel to obtain insurance coverage. Restorical then manages the claim, including accounting, to ensure the cleanup is funded in a timely manner.

What We Look For

  • Historical insurance policies (pre-1986)
  • Policy numbers, carrier names, and coverage periods
  • Connection between contamination timing and policy period
  • Evidence linking cleanup obligation to insured activity

What We Deliver

  • Historical Coverage Chart
  • Trigger Analysis & Property/Policy Nexus
  • Coverage strategy with recommendations
  • Insurance funding for your remediation
  • Claims Management & Forensic Accounting

The Restorical Proven Process

Task 1 — Research and Analysis
Restorical searches for viable historical insurance policies, researches the site history, analyzes the contamination impacts, and underwrites potential coverage — including a proprietary trigger analysis. At the end of Task 1, we provide a clear yes or no on whether a successful cost recovery is possible, along with a strategy and recommendation specific to your situation, even if you are not the policyholder.
Task 2 — Coverage and Funding
When Task 1 confirms viable coverage, Restorical works with your legal counsel to tender the claim, negotiate and secure insurance coverage. Restorical will manage the ongoing claim process, including accounting to ensure the insurance companies are funding your remediation in a timely manner.

Ready to learn more?

Contact Us

This analysis is preliminary and based on publicly available records. Restorical Research is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.