Bulk Plant cleanup site — Restorical Research
McEvoy Texaco
Bellingham, Whatcom County
Restorical Research
Preliminary Site-Specific Analysis

This property has a documented history as a bulk fuel distribution terminal predating 1986. Historical insurance policies issued during those prior operations and through 1986 could fund a cleanup — and recover costs already spent.

The McEvoy Texaco property in Bellingham operated as a petroleum bulk plant, with petroleum hydrocarbons contaminating soil across the site. An independent remedial action was conducted between October and December 1999 to address the contamination, though two discrete areas of petroleum-affected soil were determined to be technically infeasible and cost-prohibitive to excavate. A restrictive covenant now governs those zones, requiring continued monitoring, operation, and maintenance as part of the ongoing remediation. That history could support an insurance cost recovery claim against carriers who issued insurance policies 40+ years ago.

Former Use
Former Bulk Plant
AddressBellingham, Whatcom County
Historical UseBulk Plant
Est. Operating SincePre-1986
StatusCleanup Started
Contamination & Investigation
Site Assessment Summary
ContaminantsPetroleum hydrocarbons detected in soil
Media ImpactedSoil, Groundwater
Regulatory ProgramMTCA — Standard Cleanup
Ecology Site #6042

Why Historical Insurance Policies May Be Accessible

Pre-1986 Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies were occurrence-based and did not contain an effective pollution exclusion in Washington. If contamination occurred while those policies were active, those historical insurance carriers may still have a legal obligation to fund the cleanup costs, even if the business closed or the property changed hands.

Petroleum bulk storage at this Bellingham property predates 1986, placing the origin of contamination squarely within the era when occurrence-based CGL policies carried no effective pollution exclusion in Washington. The remediation costs documented here — the 1999 independent remedial action, the designation of restricted zones where excavation proved cost-prohibitive, and the open-ended monitoring and maintenance obligations enforced by the restrictive covenant — represent both past expenditures and continuing liabilities that historical carriers who covered McEvoy Texaco's bulk-plant operations may be obligated to fund.

Restorical's role is to locate viable historical policies, determine whether a successful coverage claim is possible, and assist our clients and their legal counsel to obtain insurance coverage. Restorical then manages the claim, including accounting, to ensure the cleanup is funded in a timely manner.

What We Look For

  • Historical insurance policies (pre-1986)
  • Policy numbers, carrier names, and coverage periods
  • Connection between contamination timing and policy period
  • Evidence linking cleanup obligation to insured activity

What We Deliver

  • Historical Coverage Chart
  • Trigger Analysis & Property/Policy Nexus
  • Coverage strategy with recommendations
  • Insurance funding for your remediation
  • Claims Management & Forensic Accounting

The Restorical Proven Process

Task 1 — Research and Analysis
Restorical searches for viable historical insurance policies, researches the site history, analyzes the contamination impacts, and underwrites potential coverage — including a proprietary trigger analysis. At the end of Task 1, we provide a clear yes or no on whether a successful cost recovery is possible, along with a strategy and recommendation specific to your situation, even if you are not the policyholder.
Task 2 — Coverage and Funding
When Task 1 confirms viable coverage, Restorical works with your legal counsel to tender the claim, negotiate and secure insurance coverage. Restorical will manage the ongoing claim process, including accounting to ensure the insurance companies are funding your remediation in a timely manner.

Ready to learn more?

Contact Us

This analysis is preliminary and based on publicly available records. Restorical Research is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.