Farm/Agriculture cleanup site — Restorical Research
Kershaw Orchard
Gleed/Yakima, Yakima County
Restorical Research
Preliminary Site-Specific Analysis

This property has a documented history as a farm and agricultural operation predating 1986. Historical insurance policies issued during those prior operations and through 1986 could fund a cleanup.

This property, known as Kershaw Fruit & Cold Storage, operated in an active orchard area approximately four and a half miles northwest of Yakima, where a 6,000-gallon above-ground diesel storage tank supplied fuel for orchard heaters. Diesel contamination resulted from spills over a prolonged period of agricultural operations, affecting soil across the site and onto adjacent orchard roads. In October 1993 the tank was removed; contaminated soil was spread over the site and orchard roads, and some soil was removed from the property. The site is currently awaiting cleanup. That history could support an insurance cost recovery claim against carriers who issued insurance policies 40+ years ago.

Former Use
Former Farm/Agriculture
AddressGleed/Yakima, Yakima County
Historical UseFarm/Agriculture
Est. Operating SincePre-1986
StatusAwaiting Cleanup
Contamination & Investigation
Site Assessment Summary
ContaminantsDiesel fuel hydrocarbons in soil and orchard roads
Media ImpactedSoil, Surface Water
Regulatory ProgramMTCA — Standard Cleanup
Ecology Site #1596

Why Historical Insurance Policies May Be Accessible

Pre-1986 Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies were occurrence-based and did not contain an effective pollution exclusion in Washington. If contamination occurred while those policies were active, those historical insurance carriers may still have a legal obligation to fund the cleanup costs, even if the business closed or the property changed hands.

The contamination here stems from repeated operational diesel spills tied to orchard heating equipment that was in service for an extended period prior to 1986 — not a single discrete incident. Occurrence-based CGL policies issued to agricultural operators during that era carried no effective pollution exclusion and remain potentially enforceable against the historical carriers. The soil remediation work this property now requires could plausibly be funded by insurers whose policies were in force during the years of ongoing contaminating operations.

Restorical's role is to locate viable historical policies, determine whether a successful coverage claim is possible, and assist our clients and their legal counsel to obtain insurance coverage. Restorical then manages the claim, including accounting, to ensure the cleanup is funded in a timely manner.

What We Look For

  • Historical insurance policies (pre-1986)
  • Policy numbers, carrier names, and coverage periods
  • Connection between contamination timing and policy period
  • Evidence linking cleanup obligation to insured activity

What We Deliver

  • Historical Coverage Chart
  • Trigger Analysis & Property/Policy Nexus
  • Coverage strategy with recommendations
  • Insurance funding for your remediation
  • Claims Management & Forensic Accounting

The Restorical Proven Process

Task 1 — Research and Analysis
Restorical searches for viable historical insurance policies, researches the site history, analyzes the contamination impacts, and underwrites potential coverage — including a proprietary trigger analysis. At the end of Task 1, we provide a clear yes or no on whether a successful cost recovery is possible, along with a strategy and recommendation specific to your situation, even if you are not the policyholder.
Task 2 — Coverage and Funding
When Task 1 confirms viable coverage, Restorical works with your legal counsel to tender the claim, negotiate and secure insurance coverage. Restorical will manage the ongoing claim process, including accounting to ensure the insurance companies are funding your remediation in a timely manner.

Ready to learn more?

Contact Us

This analysis is preliminary and based on publicly available records. Restorical Research is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.