Heating Oil Tank cleanup site — Restorical Research
J Marcel Building
2320 Pacific Ave, Tacoma, Pierce County
Restorical Research
Preliminary Site-Specific Analysis

This property has a documented history as a property with a heating oil tank predating 1986. Historical insurance policies issued during those prior operations and through 1986 could recover the cleanup costs already paid.

The J Marcel Building was historically heated by a bunker C heating oil furnace, with the associated underground storage tank located beneath the building's basement. The UST was taken out of service in December 1999 and decommissioned in January 2000 after it was determined to have been leaking for an indeterminate period prior to discovery. Cleanup under the Voluntary Cleanup Program included excavating a section of the concrete foundation to access the tank, pumping approximately 3,000 gallons of bunker oil and water from the UST, filling and capping the tank in place, constructing a concrete berm to contain oil, capping damaged pipes, flushing 2,500 feet of municipal sewer main, and remediating a downstream pump station and wet well. An Environmental Covenant was implemented to require ongoing compliance monitoring and institutional controls, after which the site reached No Further Action status. That history could support an insurance cost recovery claim against carriers who issued insurance policies 40+ years ago.

Former Use
Former Heating Oil Tank
Address2320 Pacific Ave, Tacoma, Pierce County
Historical UseHeating Oil Tank
Est. Operating SincePre-1986
StatusNo Further Action
Contamination & Investigation
Site Assessment Summary
ContaminantsBunker C heating oil detected in soil, groundwater, and municipal sewer infrastructure
Media ImpactedSoil, Groundwater
Regulatory ProgramMTCA — Voluntary Cleanup Program
Ecology Site #1124

Why Historical Insurance Policies May Be Accessible

Pre-1986 Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies were occurrence-based and did not contain an effective pollution exclusion in Washington. If contamination occurred while those policies were active, those historical insurance carriers may still have a legal obligation to fund the cleanup costs, even if the business closed or the property changed hands.

The bunker C heating oil contamination at this property originated from a tank that had been leaking for an unquantified period before its 1999 discovery, placing the onset of the release well before that date and plausibly within or before the pre-1986 window when occurrence-based CGL policies carried no effective pollution exclusion. A release that migrated into the municipal sewer system — requiring remediation of 2,500 feet of sewer main, a pump station, and a wet well in addition to on-site foundation excavation and tank decommissioning — represents substantial documented cleanup expenditure. Historical carriers whose CGL policies were in effect when the heating oil first began leaking may still be obligated to recover those costs.

Restorical's role is to locate viable historical policies, determine whether a successful cost recovery claim is possible, and assist our clients and their legal counsel to obtain insurance coverage for costs already incurred. Restorical's forensic accounting team works to re-establish and document past cleanup expenditures, ensuring the strongest possible basis for recovery.

Recovering Costs from an Older Cleanup

If this site reached No Further Action years ago, the original cleanup expenditures may be difficult to reconstruct. Restorical's forensic accounting team specializes in re-establishing and documenting past cleanup costs — even decades later — to build the strongest possible basis for an insurance recovery claim.

What We Look For

  • Historical insurance policies (pre-1986)
  • Policy numbers, carrier names, and coverage periods
  • Connection between contamination timing and policy period
  • Evidence linking cleanup obligation to insured activity

What We Deliver

  • Historical Coverage Chart
  • Trigger Analysis & Property/Policy Nexus
  • Coverage strategy with recommendations
  • Insurance funding for your remediation
  • Claims Management & Forensic Accounting

The Restorical Proven Process

Task 1 — Research and Analysis
Restorical searches for viable historical insurance policies, researches the site history, analyzes the contamination impacts, and underwrites potential coverage — including a proprietary trigger analysis. At the end of Task 1, we provide a clear yes or no on whether a successful cost recovery is possible, along with a strategy and recommendation specific to your situation, even if you are not the policyholder.
Task 2 — Cost Recovery
When Task 1 confirms viable coverage, Restorical works with your legal counsel to tender the claim and negotiate recovery of costs already incurred. Restorical's forensic accounting team re-establishes and documents past cleanup expenditures, managing the claim process to ensure the insurance companies fulfill their obligation in a timely manner.

Ready to learn more?

Contact Us

This analysis is preliminary and based on publicly available records. Restorical Research is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.