Dry Cleaner cleanup site — Restorical Research
Faltus & Thomas Properties
Ellensburg, Kittitas County
Restorical Research
Preliminary Site-Specific Analysis

This property has a documented history as a dry cleaning facility going back to 1983. Historical insurance policies issued during those prior operations and through 1986 could fund a cleanup.

The building at 609 Seventh Avenue in Ellensburg housed a laundry and dry cleaning service that operated until approximately 1983–1984, when tetrachloroethylene (PCE) was the standard solvent for commercial dry cleaning. Groundwater sampling from a monitoring well on the Faltus & Thomas property detected PCE at a concentration of 410 µg/L. Site investigation activities spanning from at least 2002 to 2019 included the installation of three groundwater monitoring wells and the removal of 63 gallons of purge water during well development; no active groundwater remediation has yet commenced. That history could support an insurance cost recovery claim against carriers who issued insurance policies 40+ years ago.

Former Use
Former Dry Cleaner
AddressEllensburg, Kittitas County
Historical UseDry Cleaner
Est. Operating Since1983
StatusAwaiting Cleanup
Contamination & Investigation
Site Assessment Summary
ContaminantsTetrachloroethylene (PCE) detected in groundwater
Media ImpactedSoil, Groundwater
Regulatory ProgramMTCA — Standard Cleanup
Ecology Site #3291

Why Historical Insurance Policies May Be Accessible

Pre-1986 Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies were occurrence-based and did not contain an effective pollution exclusion in Washington. If contamination occurred while those policies were active, those historical insurance carriers may still have a legal obligation to fund the cleanup costs, even if the business closed or the property changed hands.

Dry cleaning operations using PCE were conducted at this address in the years immediately before 1986, when occurrence-based Commercial General Liability policies were still the industry standard in Washington and contained no effective pollution exclusion. With groundwater contamination confirmed and active remediation not yet underway, the property owner faces the full cost of designing and executing a cleanup. Pre-1986 CGL policies issued to the dry cleaning operators during that window may be the most viable avenue for funding that forthcoming remediation work.

Restorical's role is to locate viable historical policies, determine whether a successful coverage claim is possible, and assist our clients and their legal counsel to obtain insurance coverage. Restorical then manages the claim, including accounting, to ensure the cleanup is funded in a timely manner.

What We Look For

  • Historical insurance policies (pre-1986)
  • Policy numbers, carrier names, and coverage periods
  • Connection between contamination timing and policy period
  • Evidence linking cleanup obligation to insured activity

What We Deliver

  • Historical Coverage Chart
  • Trigger Analysis & Property/Policy Nexus
  • Coverage strategy with recommendations
  • Insurance funding for your remediation
  • Claims Management & Forensic Accounting

The Restorical Proven Process

Task 1 — Research and Analysis
Restorical searches for viable historical insurance policies, researches the site history, analyzes the contamination impacts, and underwrites potential coverage — including a proprietary trigger analysis. At the end of Task 1, we provide a clear yes or no on whether a successful cost recovery is possible, along with a strategy and recommendation specific to your situation, even if you are not the policyholder.
Task 2 — Coverage and Funding
When Task 1 confirms viable coverage, Restorical works with your legal counsel to tender the claim, negotiate and secure insurance coverage. Restorical will manage the ongoing claim process, including accounting to ensure the insurance companies are funding your remediation in a timely manner.

Ready to learn more?

Contact Us

This analysis is preliminary and based on publicly available records. Restorical Research is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.