Heating Oil Tank cleanup site — Restorical Research
Eakin Fruit Co
4310 Main St, Union Gap, Yakima County
Restorical Research
Preliminary Site-Specific Analysis

This property has a documented history as a property with a heating oil tank predating 1986. Historical insurance policies issued during those prior operations and through 1986 could recover the cleanup costs already paid.

The Eakin Fruit Company property in Union Gap housed a 1,000-gallon underground heating fuel tank that served a building constructed before 1963; the tank developed holes and released diesel contamination into the surrounding soil and groundwater. Cleanup under the Standard Cleanup program included excavation and removal of the UST together with 248 cubic yards of diesel-contaminated soil, biological treatment applied to both the impacted groundwater and remaining contaminated soil within the excavation, and a one-year quarterly groundwater monitoring program conducted through four installed wells. The site has since received a No Further Action determination. That history could support an insurance cost recovery claim against carriers who issued insurance policies 40+ years ago.

Former Use
Former Heating Oil Tank
Address4310 Main St, Union Gap, Yakima County
Historical UseHeating Oil Tank
Est. Operating SincePre-1986
StatusNo Further Action
Contamination & Investigation
Site Assessment Summary
ContaminantsDiesel (petroleum hydrocarbons) from a leaking heating fuel UST detected in soil and groundwater
Media ImpactedSoil, Groundwater
Regulatory ProgramMTCA — Standard Cleanup
Ecology Site #3137

Why Historical Insurance Policies May Be Accessible

Pre-1986 Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies were occurrence-based and did not contain an effective pollution exclusion in Washington. If contamination occurred while those policies were active, those historical insurance carriers may still have a legal obligation to fund the cleanup costs, even if the business closed or the property changed hands.

The heating fuel tank responsible for the contamination here served a building constructed before 1963, placing its installation and decades of operation squarely within the era when occurrence-based Commercial General Liability policies carried no effective pollution exclusion. A leaking UST releasing diesel into soil and groundwater is precisely the type of slow, subsurface discharge those pre-1986 policies were written to address. The documented remediation costs — tank removal, soil excavation, biological treatment, and a year of quarterly groundwater monitoring — are expenditures that historical carriers who issued CGL policies to Eakin Fruit Company during that pre-1986 operational window may still be obligated to fund.

Restorical's role is to locate viable historical policies, determine whether a successful cost recovery claim is possible, and assist our clients and their legal counsel to obtain insurance coverage for costs already incurred. Restorical's forensic accounting team works to re-establish and document past cleanup expenditures, ensuring the strongest possible basis for recovery.

Recovering Costs from an Older Cleanup

If this site reached No Further Action years ago, the original cleanup expenditures may be difficult to reconstruct. Restorical's forensic accounting team specializes in re-establishing and documenting past cleanup costs — even decades later — to build the strongest possible basis for an insurance recovery claim.

What We Look For

  • Historical insurance policies (pre-1986)
  • Policy numbers, carrier names, and coverage periods
  • Connection between contamination timing and policy period
  • Evidence linking cleanup obligation to insured activity

What We Deliver

  • Historical Coverage Chart
  • Trigger Analysis & Property/Policy Nexus
  • Coverage strategy with recommendations
  • Insurance funding for your remediation
  • Claims Management & Forensic Accounting

The Restorical Proven Process

Task 1 — Research and Analysis
Restorical searches for viable historical insurance policies, researches the site history, analyzes the contamination impacts, and underwrites potential coverage — including a proprietary trigger analysis. At the end of Task 1, we provide a clear yes or no on whether a successful cost recovery is possible, along with a strategy and recommendation specific to your situation, even if you are not the policyholder.
Task 2 — Cost Recovery
When Task 1 confirms viable coverage, Restorical works with your legal counsel to tender the claim and negotiate recovery of costs already incurred. Restorical's forensic accounting team re-establishes and documents past cleanup expenditures, managing the claim process to ensure the insurance companies fulfill their obligation in a timely manner.

Ready to learn more?

Contact Us

This analysis is preliminary and based on publicly available records. Restorical Research is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.