Industrial & Manufacturing cleanup site — Restorical Research
Stella Jones JH Baxter Arlington
6520 188th St NE, Arlington, Snohomish County
Restorical Research
Preliminary Site-Specific Analysis

This property has a documented history as a industrial and manufacturing facility going back to 1960. Historical insurance policies issued during those prior operations and through 1986 could fund a cleanup — and recover costs already spent.

This 52-acre property operated as a pole processing and wood preservation plant beginning in 1960 under Ted Butcher Inc., with operations continuing under J.H. Baxter from 1970 using pentachlorophenol (PCP) and creosote as wood-treating preservatives. Documented releases of PCP solution from butt tanks and treatment operations occurred as early as 1981, with tank upgrades recorded in 1974, 1975, 1979, 1981, and 1984. Cleanup activities have included excavation and off-site disposal of contaminated soil and tar-like materials, recovery of spilled PCP solutions, construction of containment systems and stormwater infiltration drains, abandonment of a private drinking water well with connection to municipal supply, a multi-year woodwaste landfill closure project, and continuing groundwater monitoring and site assessment. That history could support an insurance cost recovery claim against carriers who issued insurance policies 40+ years ago.

Former Use
Former Industrial & Manufacturing
Address6520 188th St NE, Arlington, Snohomish County
Historical UseIndustrial & Manufacturing
Est. Operating Since1960
StatusCleanup Started
Contamination & Investigation
Site Assessment Summary
ContaminantsPentachlorophenol (PCP) and creosote detected in soil and groundwater from wood treating operations and butt tank releases
Media ImpactedSoil, Groundwater, Surface Water, Air
Regulatory ProgramMTCA — Standard Cleanup
Ecology Site #4768

Why Historical Insurance Policies May Be Accessible

Pre-1986 Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies were occurrence-based and did not contain an effective pollution exclusion in Washington. If contamination occurred while those policies were active, those historical insurance carriers may still have a legal obligation to fund the cleanup costs, even if the business closed or the property changed hands.

Pentachlorophenol and creosote contamination at this property originated from wood treating operations that began in 1960 — more than two decades before 1986, when occurrence-based Commercial General Liability policies were still the industry standard and carried no effective pollution exclusion. The documented cost trail here is substantial: soil excavation and off-site disposal, chemical recovery operations, engineered containment, a landfill closure, drinking water infrastructure replacement, and long-term groundwater monitoring. Historical carriers who issued CGL policies to the operators during that pre-1986 operational window may be obligated both to recover documented remediation expenditures and to fund the ongoing cleanup work that remains.

Restorical's role is to locate viable historical policies, determine whether a successful coverage claim is possible, and assist our clients and their legal counsel to obtain insurance coverage. Restorical then manages the claim, including accounting, to ensure the cleanup is funded in a timely manner.

What We Look For

  • Historical insurance policies (pre-1986)
  • Policy numbers, carrier names, and coverage periods
  • Connection between contamination timing and policy period
  • Evidence linking cleanup obligation to insured activity

What We Deliver

  • Historical Coverage Chart
  • Trigger Analysis & Property/Policy Nexus
  • Coverage strategy with recommendations
  • Insurance funding for your remediation
  • Claims Management & Forensic Accounting

The Restorical Proven Process

Task 1 — Research and Analysis
Restorical searches for viable historical insurance policies, researches the site history, analyzes the contamination impacts, and underwrites potential coverage — including a proprietary trigger analysis. At the end of Task 1, we provide a clear yes or no on whether a successful cost recovery is possible, along with a strategy and recommendation specific to your situation, even if you are not the policyholder.
Task 2 — Coverage and Funding
When Task 1 confirms viable coverage, Restorical works with your legal counsel to tender the claim, negotiate and secure insurance coverage. Restorical will manage the ongoing claim process, including accounting to ensure the insurance companies are funding your remediation in a timely manner.

Ready to learn more?

Contact Us

This analysis is preliminary and based on publicly available records. Restorical Research is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.