PFAS cleanup site — Restorical Research
Sullivan Fire Training Center
Spokane Valley, Spokane County
Restorical Research
Preliminary Site-Specific Analysis

This property has a documented history as a facility using PFAS-containing firefighting foam predating 1986. Historical insurance policies issued during those prior operations and through 1986 could fund a cleanup.

This property served as the fire training center for the Spokane Valley Fire Department, where aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) was historically used during training exercises, resulting in PFAS contamination from the release of firefighting foam to a swale on the south end of the property. Analytical sampling has confirmed soil concentrations of PFAS from those historical releases. The site has entered the Voluntary Cleanup Program, and anticipated ground-disturbing cleanup activities will require cultural resource review prior to commencing. That history could support an insurance cost recovery claim against carriers who issued insurance policies 40+ years ago.

Former Use
Former PFAS
AddressSpokane Valley, Spokane County
Historical UsePFAS
Est. Operating SincePre-1986
StatusAwaiting Cleanup
Contamination & Investigation
Site Assessment Summary
ContaminantsPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from historical AFFF firefighting foam releases detected in soil
Media ImpactedSoil, Groundwater
Regulatory ProgramMTCA — Voluntary Cleanup Program
Ecology Site #17095

Why Historical Insurance Policies May Be Accessible

Pre-1986 Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies were occurrence-based and did not contain an effective pollution exclusion in Washington. If contamination occurred while those policies were active, those historical insurance carriers may still have a legal obligation to fund the cleanup costs, even if the business closed or the property changed hands.

The PFAS contamination at this site originated from recurring AFFF applications during training operations that, by the documents' own description, were historical in nature — making it probable that the facility operated before 1986, when occurrence-based CGL policies still covered pollution events without effective exclusion. Because active remediation has not yet begun, the full cost of investigating and cleaning up the PFAS plume in soil lies ahead. Historical carriers whose policies were in force during those training exercises may be obligated to fund that upcoming cleanup rather than leaving the current property owner to bear those costs alone.

Restorical's role is to locate viable historical policies, determine whether a successful coverage claim is possible, and assist our clients and their legal counsel to obtain insurance coverage. Restorical then manages the claim, including accounting, to ensure the cleanup is funded in a timely manner.

What We Look For

  • Historical insurance policies (pre-1986)
  • Policy numbers, carrier names, and coverage periods
  • Connection between contamination timing and policy period
  • Evidence linking cleanup obligation to insured activity

What We Deliver

  • Historical Coverage Chart
  • Trigger Analysis & Property/Policy Nexus
  • Coverage strategy with recommendations
  • Insurance funding for your remediation
  • Claims Management & Forensic Accounting

The Restorical Proven Process

Task 1 — Research and Analysis
Restorical searches for viable historical insurance policies, researches the site history, analyzes the contamination impacts, and underwrites potential coverage — including a proprietary trigger analysis. At the end of Task 1, we provide a clear yes or no on whether a successful cost recovery is possible, along with a strategy and recommendation specific to your situation, even if you are not the policyholder.
Task 2 — Coverage and Funding
When Task 1 confirms viable coverage, Restorical works with your legal counsel to tender the claim, negotiate and secure insurance coverage. Restorical will manage the ongoing claim process, including accounting to ensure the insurance companies are funding your remediation in a timely manner.

Ready to learn more?

Contact Us

This analysis is preliminary and based on publicly available records. Restorical Research is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.