Industrial & Manufacturing cleanup site — Restorical Research
Munger Landing
Superior, Douglas County
Restorical Research
Preliminary Site-Specific Analysis

This property has a documented history as an industrial and manufacturing facility going back to 1953. Historical insurance policies issued during those prior operations and through 1986 could help fund the multi-phase investigation and remediation work ahead under Wisconsin DNR oversight.

A motor and transformer repair facility operated from 1953 to 1986, discharging polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and metals through surface water drainages and municipal sewer lines into the St. Louis River. Contaminated sediments have been confirmed in the river on the Wisconsin side in Superior, and the site is an active Wisconsin DNR Environmental Remediation Program case. Remedial action is proceeding under the Great Lakes Legacy Act in coordination with federal and state environmental agencies. That history could support an insurance coverage claim against the carriers who issued policies more than 40 years ago — coverage that could help fund the cleanup ahead.

Former Use
Former Industrial & Manufacturing
LocationSuperior, Douglas County
Historical UseIndustrial & Manufacturing
Est. Operating Since1953
DNR ProgramEnvironmental Remediation Program
Contamination & Investigation
Site Assessment Summary
ContaminantsPolychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and metals in river sediments
Regulatory ProgramWisconsin DNR — NR 700
BRRTS #02-16-580678

Why Historical Insurance Policies May Be Accessible

Pre-1986 Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies were occurrence-based and did not contain an effective pollution exclusion in Wisconsin — and those policies may provide coverage that remains enforceable today. If contamination occurred while those policies were active, those historical insurance carriers may still have a legal obligation to fund the cleanup costs, even if the business closed or the property changed hands.

The industrial operations that generated PCB and metals contamination began in 1953, with PCB discharges occurring throughout the pre-1986 period until the substances were banned under TSCA in 1979. The sediment remediation, ongoing investigation, and long-term monitoring required in the St. Louis River represent future costs that those historical carriers may be obligated to fund.

Restorical's role is to locate viable historical policies, determine whether a successful coverage claim is possible, and assist our clients and their legal counsel to obtain insurance coverage. Restorical then manages the claim, including accounting, to ensure the cleanup is funded in a timely manner.

What We Look For

  • Historical insurance policies (pre-1986)
  • Policy numbers, carrier names, and coverage periods
  • Connection between contamination timing and policy period
  • Evidence linking cleanup obligation to insured activity

What We Deliver

  • Historical Coverage Chart
  • Trigger Analysis & Property/Policy Nexus
  • Coverage strategy with recommendations
  • Insurance funding for your remediation
  • Claims Management

The Restorical Proven Process

Task 1 — Research and Analysis
Restorical searches for viable historical insurance policies, researches the site history, analyzes the contamination impacts, and underwrites potential coverage — including a proprietary trigger analysis. At the end of Task 1, we provide a clear yes or no on whether viable insurance coverage exists to fund the cleanup, along with a strategy and recommendation specific to your situation, even if you are not the policyholder.
Task 2 — Coverage and Funding
When Task 1 confirms viable coverage, Restorical works with your legal counsel to tender the claim, negotiate and secure insurance coverage. Restorical will manage the ongoing claim process, including accounting to ensure the insurance companies are funding your remediation in a timely manner.

Request more information on this property

Contact Us

This analysis is preliminary and based on publicly available records. Restorical Research is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.